Trump's Presidency: A 39% Approval Rating At The 100-Day Mark

Kenji Nakamura

5 min read

Post on Apr 30, 2025

4.9

Share

Policy Decisions and Public Opinion: The Impact on Trump's 39% Approval Rating

The initial policy decisions made during Trump's presidency significantly influenced his 39% approval rating. These actions sparked considerable public debate and controversy, impacting public perception of his leadership.

Controversial Executive Orders and Their Fallout:

Several executive orders implemented early in Trump's presidency generated substantial negative public reaction.

• The Travel Ban: This executive order, restricting entry from several Muslim-majority countries, faced widespread condemnation for its discriminatory nature. Polls showed significant public disapproval, contributing to the low presidential approval ratings.
• Withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the TPP trade agreement alienated many who viewed it as crucial for economic growth and international cooperation. This action further fueled the negative sentiment surrounding his administration.

Numerous surveys conducted during this period revealed a significant portion of the population opposed these policies, with disapproval rates particularly high among younger voters, minorities, and urban populations. The impact of these policies on different demographic groups contributed significantly to the overall low 39% approval rating.

Legislative Achievements (or Lack Thereof) and Public Perception:

The first 100 days also saw limited legislative achievements, further impacting public perception.

• Healthcare Reform: Despite campaign promises, significant legislative action on healthcare reform proved elusive during this initial period. This lack of progress fueled criticism from both supporters and opponents, contributing to low approval ratings.
• Infrastructure Spending: While infrastructure investment was a key campaign promise, concrete legislative progress remained limited during the first 100 days, leading to further public disappointment.

Public opinion on these legislative efforts, or lack thereof, was largely negative. The perceived inaction and partisan gridlock in Congress further exacerbated the already low approval ratings for Trump's presidency during this critical 100-day period.

Communication Strategy and Media Coverage: Fueling the Negative Narrative around Trump's Presidency

Trump's communication style and the media's portrayal of his administration played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and contributing to his 39% approval rating.

Trump's Communication Style and Its Effects:

Trump's unconventional communication style, characterized by frequent use of Twitter and large rallies, influenced public perception in both positive and negative ways.

• Twitter Diplomacy: Trump’s use of Twitter to make announcements and engage in political discourse often generated controversy and criticism, leading to further negative press coverage.
• Rally Rhetoric: His rallies, marked by strong rhetoric and sometimes divisive statements, polarized the public further.
• "Fake News": Trump's frequent use of the term "fake news" to discredit unfavorable media coverage eroded public trust in established news outlets.

Media Representation and its Influence on Approval Ratings:

Media coverage of Trump's presidency was intense and highly partisan.

• Media Bias: The perceived (and sometimes real) bias in media reporting contributed to the polarization of public opinion.
• News Framing: The framing of news stories often emphasized negative aspects of the Trump administration, amplifying negative narratives and contributing to lower approval ratings.
• Social Media Amplification: Social media platforms further amplified both positive and negative narratives surrounding Trump's presidency, accelerating the spread of information – and misinformation.

Economic Indicators and Public Sentiment: Did Economic Performance Influence the 39% Approval Rating?

While economic indicators during the first 100 days offered a mixed picture, public sentiment regarding the economy played a role in shaping the 39% approval rating.

Economic Data at the 100-Day Mark:

Economic data during the first 100 days presented a complex picture.

• Job Growth: Job growth figures were relatively positive, yet public perception did not fully reflect this positive trend.
• GDP Growth: GDP growth figures showed modest increases, but this was not sufficient to significantly shift public opinion.

The disconnect between the actual economic data and the public’s perception of the economy influenced the overall approval rating.

Public Expectations vs. Reality:

Public expectations for economic performance under a Trump presidency were high.

• Campaign Promises: Campaign promises of significant economic growth created high expectations among supporters.
• Reality Check: The relatively modest economic growth during the first 100 days fell short of these expectations, leading to some disappointment and contributing to the low approval rating. The perception of economic performance, rather than the data itself, became the defining factor in public opinion.

Conclusion: Understanding the 39% – Lessons from Trump's First 100 Days

Trump's 39% approval rating at the 100-day mark resulted from a complex interplay of factors. Controversial policy decisions, a divisive communication style, intense media scrutiny, and a disconnect between economic indicators and public perception all contributed to this historically low figure. This 39% signifies a significant challenge for any new president, highlighting the crucial role of policy, communication, and public perception in shaping a successful presidency. To understand the complexities of presidential approval ratings and their impact on governance, further research into Trump’s presidency and similar historical data is crucial. Analyzing presidential approval ratings, particularly those within the first 100 days, offers valuable insights into the dynamics of public opinion and its influence on the political landscape.