Will Trump Finalize A New Trade Agreement With Britain?

Kenji Nakamura

4 min read

Post on May 10, 2025

4.9

Share

The State of US-UK Trade Relations Post-Brexit

Post-Brexit trade between the US and UK presents a complex picture. Understanding the current relationship is crucial to assessing the feasibility of a new trade agreement.

• Current Trade Relationship: Even without a comprehensive agreement, significant trade continues between the US and UK. However, this trade faces tariffs and non-tariff barriers, impacting competitiveness and efficiency. Existing tariffs, particularly on agricultural products, create friction and limit trade volume.

• Brexit's Impact: Brexit significantly altered the trading landscape. The UK's departure from the European Union removed it from the EU's single market and customs union, necessitating new trade arrangements with numerous countries, including the US. This transition period created uncertainty and complexities that impacted negotiations.

• Existing Agreements: Prior to Brexit, trade between the US and UK was governed largely by the WTO rules. Post-Brexit, there have been attempts to establish new frameworks, but no comprehensive trade agreement was reached during the Trump administration.

• Economic Implications of a Lack of Agreement: The absence of a US-UK trade deal continues to limit the potential for economic growth on both sides. Reduced market access, increased costs, and hampered investment opportunities are key consequences. The economic impact has been a key driver in the discussions surrounding a potential agreement.

Key Obstacles to a Trump-Brokered Trade Deal

Several significant obstacles hampered the progress of a Trump-brokered US-UK trade deal. These challenges extended beyond simple trade negotiations, encompassing political and regulatory complexities.

• Regulatory Differences: Differing regulatory standards between the US and UK, particularly in areas like food safety, pharmaceuticals, and data privacy, created significant hurdles. Harmonizing these standards would require extensive negotiation and compromise.

• Political Hurdles: Internal political dynamics within both the US and UK governments presented challenges. Shifting political priorities, internal divisions, and the overall complexity of trade negotiations contributed to delays and difficulties.

• Influence of Other Trade Deals: The existence of other significant trade agreements, such as the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), influenced US priorities and resources, potentially diverting attention from the US-UK negotiations.

• Lingering Impact of the Northern Ireland Protocol: The Northern Ireland Protocol, designed to avoid a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, created complications for any UK-wide trade deal. It introduced complex customs arrangements and raised concerns about trade disruptions within the UK itself.

Potential Benefits of a US-UK Trade Agreement

Despite the obstacles, a comprehensive US-UK trade agreement holds considerable potential benefits for both economies.

• Economic Growth: A deal could stimulate significant economic growth by increasing trade volume, reducing barriers, and fostering greater economic integration.

• Market Access: Businesses in both countries would gain increased access to larger markets, leading to expanded sales and export opportunities.

• Investment Opportunities: The agreement could attract substantial foreign direct investment (FDI), creating jobs and boosting economic activity in both the US and UK.

• Improved Competitiveness: A strong trade agreement would improve the overall economic competitiveness of both nations by streamlining trade flows, reducing costs, and fostering innovation.

Analysis of Trump's Trade Policy and its Relevance

Trump's "America First" trade policy significantly influenced his approach to international trade, including negotiations with the UK.

• America First Trade Policy: This policy emphasized bilateral trade deals and prioritized protecting American interests, often through tariffs and aggressive negotiation tactics.

• Bilateral vs. Multilateral: Trump favored bilateral agreements over multilateral ones, believing they provided greater negotiating leverage.

• Impact on UK Negotiations: His approach, while successful in some areas, arguably hindered a swift agreement with the UK. The emphasis on immediate benefits for the US potentially overshadowed the importance of long-term partnership building.

Conclusion

This article examined the likelihood of a finalized US-UK trade agreement under the Trump administration, weighing the considerable obstacles and potential benefits. While the initial optimism surrounding a swift deal proved unrealistic, the underlying economic incentives for both nations remain strong. The future of this relationship and the possibility of a future trade agreement remain open questions and subject to ongoing political and economic conditions.

Call to Action: The future of the US-UK trade relationship is uncertain, with the possibility of a future agreement still in play. Stay informed on developments regarding the Trump-Britain trade agreement and its implications for global commerce. Continue to follow our coverage for updates on this crucial negotiation.