Trump To Pardon Pete Rose After Death: Fact Or Fiction?

Kenji Nakamura

5 min read

Post on Apr 29, 2025

4.3

Share

The Legal Landscape of Posthumous Pardons

The legal framework surrounding posthumous pardons is complex and largely untested, especially at the federal level. Understanding this landscape is crucial to assessing the feasibility of a Trump pardon for Pete Rose after his death.

Federal vs. State Pardons

The distinction between federal and state pardons is critical. Rose's ban stems from his violation of Major League Baseball rules, not a federal crime. While a presidential pardon from Trump could potentially address any federal repercussions (though none exist in this case), it wouldn't automatically overturn MLB's lifetime ban. Only MLB commissioner Rob Manfred has the authority to reinstate Rose. A federal pardon might influence public opinion and perhaps indirectly pressure MLB, but it wouldn't legally compel a reversal of the ban.

• Precedent for Posthumous Pardons: There's limited precedent for posthumous pardons at the federal level in the United States. While some states allow for them under specific circumstances, the federal government lacks a clearly defined process.
• Legal Challenges: Even if Trump were to issue a posthumous pardon, it could face legal challenges. Opponents might argue it exceeds the president's constitutional authority or that it lacks legal standing without a living recipient.
• Impact on Rose's Legacy: A posthumous pardon could significantly alter Rose's legacy, potentially paving the way for his induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame, a highly debated topic among baseball enthusiasts.

Trump's Stance on Pete Rose and Pardons

Donald Trump's record on presidential pardons is well-documented, featuring a mix of controversial and widely supported decisions. Examining his past actions offers clues, though no direct statements confirm his intentions toward Pete Rose.

Public Statements and Actions

Trump has often shown a willingness to grant pardons that defy conventional wisdom, often based on personal connections or political considerations. This raises questions about whether he would extend a similar leniency to Rose, even posthumously.

• Past Pardons: Trump's pardons of individuals like Roger Stone and Michael Flynn, both highly controversial figures, demonstrate his willingness to intervene in cases with significant public debate. These examples suggest a potential willingness to grant a pardon that might be seen as controversial by some.
• Public Statements on Rose: While there have been no public statements directly addressing a posthumous pardon for Pete Rose, Trump's past comments on pardons and his known admiration for certain athletes could potentially offer insight into his likely actions.
• Political Implications: A posthumous pardon for Rose would likely carry significant political implications, potentially reigniting discussions about the nature of presidential power and the role of forgiveness in public life.

Arguments For and Against a Posthumous Pardon for Pete Rose

The debate surrounding a potential posthumous pardon for Pete Rose is filled with strongly held opinions on both sides.

Arguments in Favor

Proponents of a pardon often point to the passage of time, Rose's age at the time of the ban, and the potential impact on his family's legacy.

• Rehabilitation and Changed Circumstances: Supporters might argue that Rose has demonstrated remorse and rehabilitation over the decades since his ban, despite never officially admitting wrongdoing.
• Harshness of the Ban: The argument could be made that the lifetime ban is excessively harsh compared to punishments in other similar cases, especially considering the time that has elapsed.

Arguments Against

Opponents emphasize the severity of Rose's actions, arguing that a pardon would undermine baseball's integrity and set a dangerous precedent.

• Seriousness of Gambling on Games: Critics would point to the inherent conflict of interest and potential damage to the integrity of the sport caused by Rose's gambling activities. A pardon, they might argue, minimizes the seriousness of his actions.
• Setting a Negative Precedent: A posthumous pardon, critics contend, could encourage future athletes to engage in similar misconduct, believing that a pardon is a possibility.

Public Opinion and the Baseball Community's Reaction

The baseball community and the general public are deeply divided on the question of a posthumous pardon for Pete Rose.

Fan Sentiment and Media Coverage

Polls and online discussions reveal a wide spectrum of opinion, ranging from ardent support to absolute opposition. The media coverage reflects this division, with opinions expressed on both sides.

• Diverse Public Opinion: Surveys and social media activity indicate a diverse range of opinions on this issue, highlighting the complexities and passion surrounding Pete Rose's legacy and potential rehabilitation.
• Media Representation: Media outlets have offered diverse perspectives, reflecting the varied opinions across the baseball community and the general public.
• Baseball Analyst Opinions: Experts and former players also exhibit varied opinions, reflecting the multifaceted nature of this issue.

Conclusion

The question of whether Donald Trump would—or should—grant Pete Rose a posthumous pardon remains deeply divisive. The legal precedents are unclear, the political implications are significant, and public opinion is sharply divided. While a federal pardon would not overturn MLB's decision, it would undoubtedly carry symbolic weight and potentially impact Rose's legacy and the ongoing debate surrounding his Hall of Fame eligibility. The lack of clear precedent and the ethical complexities involved ensure that this topic will continue to generate discussion for years to come. What are your thoughts on the possibility of a posthumous pardon for Pete Rose? Share your opinion in the comments below! #PeteRose #PosthumousPardon #Trump #Baseball